Platform
Security
Run security checks with code review and releases, not as a last-minute gate.
Product
Posture, policy, and evidence in one place
Findings, approvals, and audit evidence live next to your code changes.
Capabilities
Controls you can enforce continuous trust
Strict guardrails where risk is high. Flexible rules where teams need to move fast.
Threat modeling
Map attack surface from repos and dependencies before you ship.
- Automated attack-surface analysis
- Security posture assessment
- Vulnerability trend reporting
Automated remediation
Fix gaps with policy-backed changes, not one-off tickets.
- Vulnerability patch suggestions
- Policy-based code fixes
- Security rollback support
Policy enforcement
Guardrails so every merge follows your security standards.
- Custom policy guardrails
- Centralized governance
- Shift-left security checks
Audit trails
Evidence tied to commits, approvals, and who did what.
- SOC 2 evidence logging
- GDPR data-access auditing
- Tamper-resistant audit logs
Impact
What security teams track
Results vary by stack and policy. These are the signals teams watch day to day.
Compliance frameworks
Control mapping for auditors
Bleenk does not replace your assessor. It organizes evidence and policy checks so frameworks are easier to document.
SOC 2 Type II
Trust Services Criteria for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.
AICPA · SOC
HIPAA
US health data rules for safeguards, breach notification, and patient rights around PHI.
HHS · HIPAA
GDPR
EU regulation on lawful processing, data subject rights, and cross-border transfers of personal data.
European Commission
ISO 27001
International standard for establishing, operating, and continually improving an ISMS.
ISO.org
Example output
In-product Security Audit tab
Layout mirrors the studio panel. Security Findings shows audit metrics and severity buckets; Compliance shows only framework status. Numbers are from a cleared sample run, not a live tenant.
Security Audit
Run a full-repository audit and review findings by severity.
No open findings for this sample task. Switch to for framework summaries.
Task: 33b144d7-bb71-4454-82e6-ae5fe98f11b4
Reviewed Files
32 files reviewed
Audit Summary
0
Total Checks
0
Passed
0
Failed
0
Critical
0
High
0
Medium
Checklist Coverage
No tier gaps for the configured checklist on this sample.
Critical (0)
No findings.
High (0)
No findings.
Medium (0)
No findings.
Low (0)
No findings.
Application security audit
What we review in your stack
Repos, pipelines, and runtime config. Not generic questionnaires.
Source, CI, and release integrity
- Branch protection and required-check coverage
- Build provenance, signed artifacts, and promotion gates
- Pipeline secrets, OIDC trust boundaries, and environment separation
Dependencies, SBOM, and licenses
- Transitive dependency risk and upgrade paths
- SBOM generation and drift when manifests change
- License policy conflicts blocking merge where configured
Application and API surface
- Authentication, session, and OAuth/OIDC flow review signals
- CORS, rate limiting, and input validation hotspots
- OWASP Top 10 oriented checks mapped to routes and handlers
Secrets, data, and observability
- Secret scanning across history and IaC templates
- PII tagging, log redaction, and retention policy alignment
- Security-relevant metrics and alert routing to on-call paths
Continuous verification
Policies that rerun when things change
Checks rerun when dependencies, infra, or auth paths change. Old passes do not hide new risk.
- Policy-as-code
- Rules live next to repos. Violations block merges or open safe auto-fix PRs.
- Drift & delta
- Compare posture across releases and environments. Export evidence for review boards.
- Evidence bundle
- Records show who approved, what ran, what failed, and what shipped.
How it fits
From risk to evidence
Findings, policy decisions, and evidence sit next to code review and release checks.